Thousands of Mainers get their prescriptions
through CVS Caremark's chain of pharmacies -- the largest in the country. The
company also manages a drug benefit for health plans and large employers. But
buyer beware, say consumer advocates who are calling on regulators to crack down
on CVS for allegedly breaking consumer protection laws.
"There's a built-in,
major conflict of interest that is not benefiting consumers." Sharon Treat is a
Democratic state representative from Hallowell and Executive Director of the
National Legislative Association on Prescription Drug Prices. She's referring
to the conflicts of interests she and other legislators in the group see in the
2007 merger between CVS and Caremark, which essentially had the drugstore giant
buying a leading pharmacy benefit manager.
The group wants the Federal
Trade Commission to investigate alleged anti-competitive practices such as one
involving a CVS Caremark prescription program. "And in this program, the company
informs consumers that if they want to continue to fill prescriptions at their
current co-pay, they have to switch their prescription to mail order or to a CVS
store, and if they don't use a CVS store, then they have to pay an increased
co-pay," Treat says. "You know, this is not something benefiting the consumer,
it's something benefiting CVS."
The group says that CVS Caremark also
steers consumers toward more expensive and less effective drugs in exchange for
payments from drug companies.
Mike DeAngelis, spokesman for the
Woonsocket, Rhode Island-based company, disputes the allegations in a written
statement. In it he says, "Our integrated pharmacy and PBM operations provide
greater choice and more convenience for patients, improve health outcomes, and
lower overall health care costs for plan sponsors and participants."
The
demand for a review from the FTC, which has yet to respond to the legislative
group and did not return calls for this story, comes as advocates accuse CVS
stores of overcharging their customers.
"An overcharge will happen when
the scanner charges more than the lowest price than represented to the customer
in the store," says Edgar Dworksy, the founder of ConsumerWorld.org, and a
former assistant attorney general in Massachusetts. A consortium of labor
unions there recently used reports from state inspections to show what it
describes as pricing violations at CVS.
Though Dworsky says he is not
affiliated with the labor group, he says he is disturbed by the findings that
show CVS overcharged customers about five times more often than other leading
drugstore chains in the state. "So it may be in the circular that says the item
is on sale for 99 cents, or there may be a shelf sign that says the item is 99
cents, or there may be a sticker on the product that says the item is 99 cents.
And when they folks did the survey, if they were charged more than one of those
prices, that's an overcharge," he says.
CVS spokesman DeAngelis
responded to the overcharging allegations in a statement, saying that keeping
prices updated can be labor-intensive and lead to errors but he says CVS strives
to achieve 100% accuracy and move quickly to rectify any unintentional
discrepancy.